Humanists on SACRE

The BHA has written to all CEOs in Local Authorities asking that they consider Humanist representation on SACRE. The law still stands as it was before and as such there is no legal foundation for a Humanist representative on Group A. Co-option is the solution within the legal framework and the only practical difference this makes is in the voting. Considering that each committee only has one vote, this is not in essence a major handicap, as co-opted members contribute fully to all discussions and consultation on any decisions. The issue really is one of equity and it is not difficult to see the Humanists' objections here - and indeed for many SACREs to sympathise with that as well. It is for this reason that some SACREs, despite the legal position, have decided to have full representation on Group A (as opposed to Groups C or D, where there is no issue, but the representation is of a different nature).

Our advice is and has to remain within the legal framework. Our purpose is to support SACREs in providing quality RE and CW. It is for individual SACREs to make the final decision, and we would expect complete agreement if that means going outside statute. It is good practice for all potential members and co-optees on a SACRE, to have an agreed vision and set of principles, so that everyone is clear about the nature and purpose of SACRE.